Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head (2024)

Intel Core i5-8265U

► remove from comparison

DerIntel Core i5-8265Uist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Whiskey-Lake-Architektur basiert und wahrscheinlich im Q3 2018 vorgestellt wird (IFA als möglicher Termin). Im Vergleich zur Kaby-Lake-Refresh Generation, gibt es bei Whiskey-Lake anscheinend keine Unterschiede bis auf den verbesserten 14nm Prozess (14nm++ versus 14nm+). Verglichen mit dem Kaby-Lake-R Core i5-8250U, bietet der i5-8265U einen deutlich höheren Turbo-Boost-Takt. 3,9 GHz versus 3,4 GHz mit einem einzelnen Kern (3,8 GHz mit 2 Kernen, 3,7 bei Benutzung aller 4 Kerne). Ausserdem nutzt Whiskey Lake einen neuen PCH in 14nm mit USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) und CNVi WLAN/Bluetooth.

Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört weiterhin auf den Namen Intel UHD Graphics 620, unterscheidet sich jedoch nicht von der Intel HD Graphics 620. Im Core i7-8565U taktet sie von 300 - 1100 MHz. Weiters bietet die CPU noch einen integrierten DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller sowie VP9- und H.265-Videode- und -encoder.

Architektur

Whiskey-Lake nutzt die selbe Architektur wie Kaby-Lake, welche wiederum sehr ähnlich zur Skylake Architektur ist. Dadurch hat sich die Pro-MHz-Leistung kaum verändert. Nur der gereifte 14nm Prozess verhilft zur schnelleren Taktraten und effizienterer Performance.

Performance

Die Leistung des i5-8265U hängt stark vom konfigurierten TDP, wie lange der Boost laufen darf und von der Kühlung ab. Dadurch kann es zu einer hohen Schwankungsbreite kommen. Bereits beim i7-8550U gab es sehr große Leistungsunterschiede, vor allem bei längerer Last. Wie beim Core i7-8565U ist von einer Mehrleistung von maximal 10% im Vergleich zum Core i5-8250U auszugehen.

Grafikeinheit

Die integrierte Intel UHD Graphics 620 ist laut Intel identisch zurIntel HD Graphics 620(z.B. im Core i5-7200U). Sie verfügt wie die alteHD Graphics 520über 24 Ausführungseinheiten (EUs). Die Performance hängt stark vom verwendeten Arbeitsspeicher ab; mit schnellem DDR4-2133 im Dual-Channel-Betrieb kann sie sich mit einer dedizertenNvidia GeForce 920Mmessen.

Anders als Skylake kann Kaby Lake und Whiskey Lake nun auch H.265/HEVC im Main10-Profil mit 10 Bit Farbtiefe sowie Googles VP9-Codec in Hardware decodieren.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Fertigung erfolgt erneut verbesserten 14-Nanometer-Prozess (14nm++) mit FinFET-Transistoren. Der TDP ist weiterhin ULV-typisch mit 15 Watt spezifiziert und kann je nach Einsatzzweck zwischen 7,5 und 25 Watt variiert werden.

Achtung: Diese Informationen basieren noch auf Leaks und Gerüchten und können sich bis zum Release in Q3 2018 noch ändern.

Intel Core i5-8365U

► remove from comparison

DerIntel Core i5-8365Uist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Whiskey-Lake-Architektur basiert und im Q2 2019 als einer von zwei vPro-CPUs der WHL-U Serie vorgestellt wurde. Im Vergleich zur Kaby-Lake-Refresh Generation, gibt es bei Whiskey-Lake anscheinend keine Unterschiede bis auf den verbesserten 14nm Prozess (14nm++ versus 14nm+). Verglichen mit dem Kaby-Lake-R Core i5-8250U, bietet der i5-8365U einen deutlich höheren Turbo-Boost-Takt. 4,1 GHz versus 3,4 GHz mit einem einzelnen Kern. Ausserdem nutzt Whiskey Lake einen neuen PCH in 14nm mit USB 3.1 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) und CNVi WLAN/Bluetooth. Verglichen mit dem Vorgänger Core i5-8265U (ebenfalls Whiskey Lake), wurde der Turbo um 200 MHz erhöht.

Die integrierte Grafikkarte hört weiterhin auf den Namen Intel UHD Graphics 620, unterscheidet sich jedoch nicht von der Intel HD Graphics 620. Im Core i7-8565U taktet sie von 300 - 1100 MHz. Weiters bietet die CPU noch einen integrierten DDR4-2400 / LPDDR3-2133 Dual-Channel-Speichercontroller sowie VP9- und H.265-Videode- und -encoder.

Architektur

Whiskey-Lake nutzt die selbe Architektur wie Kaby-Lake, welche wiederum sehr ähnlich zur Skylake Architektur ist. Dadurch hat sich die Pro-MHz-Leistung kaum verändert. Nur der gereifte 14nm Prozess verhilft zur schnelleren Taktraten und effizienterer Performance.

Performance

Die Leistung des i5-8365U hängt stark vom konfigurierten TDP, wie lange der Boost laufen darf und von der Kühlung ab. Dadurch kann es zu einer hohen Schwankungsbreite kommen. Bereits beim i7-8550U gab es sehr große Leistungsunterschiede, vor allem bei längerer Last. Durch den höheren Turbo Boost, sollte die Single Thread Performance (je nach Kühlung) im Vergleich zum Core i5-8265U etwas zunehmen.

Grafikeinheit

Die integrierte Intel UHD Graphics 620 ist laut Intel identisch zurIntel HD Graphics 620(z.B. im Core i5-7200U). Sie verfügt wie die alteHD Graphics 520über 24 Ausführungseinheiten (EUs). Die Performance hängt stark vom verwendeten Arbeitsspeicher ab; mit schnellem DDR4-2133 im Dual-Channel-Betrieb kann sie sich mit einer dedizertenNvidia GeForce 920Mmessen.

Anders als Skylake kann Kaby Lake und Whiskey Lake nun auch H.265/HEVC im Main10-Profil mit 10 Bit Farbtiefe sowie Googles VP9-Codec in Hardware decodieren.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Fertigung erfolgt erneut verbesserten 14-Nanometer-Prozess (14nm++) mit FinFET-Transistoren. Der TDP ist weiterhin ULV-typisch mit 15 Watt spezifiziert und kann je nach Einsatzzweck zwischen 7,5 und 25 Watt variiert werden.

show full text

ModelIntel Core i5-8265UIntel Core i5-8365U
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core i5
CodenameWhiskey Lake-UWhiskey Lake-U
Serie: Core i5 Whiskey Lake-U
Intel Core i5-8365U1.6 -4.1GHz4/8Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head (1)6MBL3
Intel Core i5-8265U« 1.6 -3.9GHz4/8Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head (2)6MBL3
Intel Core i5-8365U« 1.6 -4.1GHz4/8Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head (3)6MBL3
Intel Core i5-8265U1.6 -3.9GHz4/8Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head (4)6MBL3
Clock1600 - 3900 MHz1600 - 4100 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketBGA1528BGA1528
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 620 (300 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8265U

26.7 pt (44%)

AMD E1-2100

2.35 -91%

...

AMD Ryzen 5 3500U

25.2 -6%

AMD Ryzen 7 2700U

25.2 -6%

AMD Ryzen 5 3550H

25.3 -5%

AMD Ryzen 7 3750H

25.6 -4%

Intel Core i3-1110G4

26 -3%

Intel Core i3-1005G1

26 -3%

Intel Processor N97

26.1 -2%

Intel Core i5-8259U

26.2 -2%

Intel Core i3-10110U

26.2 -2%

Intel Core i5-8265U

26.7

Intel Core i7-7700HQ

26.7 0%

Intel Pentium Gold 7505

26.8 0%

Intel Core i5-8257U

26.8 0%

Intel Core i5-8260U

26.8 0%

Intel Core i7-8550U

26.9 1%

AMD Ryzen 5 7520U

27 1%

AMD Ryzen 3 4300U

27.1 1%

Intel Core i3-N305

27.2 2%

Intel Core i5-1035G4

27.3 2%

...

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

47.9 79%

max:

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

60.6 127%

0%

100%

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-8365U

27.6 pt (46%)

AMD E1-2100

2.35 -91%

...

Intel Core i5-8260U

26.8 -3%

Intel Core i5-8257U

26.8 -3%

Intel Core i7-8550U

26.9 -3%

AMD Ryzen 5 7520U

27 -2%

AMD Ryzen 3 4300U

27.1 -2%

Intel Core i3-N305

27.2 -1%

Intel Core i5-1035G4

27.3 -1%

Intel Core i5-10210U

27.4 -1%

Intel Core i5-1035G1

27.4 -1%

Intel Core i5-8365U

27.6

Intel Core i5-1130G7

27.7 0%

Intel Core i5-1035G7

27.7 0%

Intel Core i5-10310U

27.7 0%

Intel Core i5-1140G7

27.8 1%

Intel Core i7-8809G

28 1%

AMD Ryzen 3 5300U

28 1%

Intel Core i7-8565U

28.2 2%

Intel Core i5-1230U

28.4 3%

Intel Core i5-9300H

28.5 3%

...

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

47.9 74%

max:

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

60.6 120%

0%

100%

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core

100%

1 i5-8265U+

3500 Points (3%)

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core

100%

1 i5-8265U+

1008 Points (43%)

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 325avg: 389.2median: 397 (44%)max: 403 Points

106%

i5-8365U+

min: 419avg: 421.3median: 421 (47%)max: 424 Points

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 972avg: 1271median: 1285.5 (3%)max: 1564 Points

110%

i5-8365U+

min: 1373avg: 1404median: 1408 (3%)max: 1430 Points

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 457avg: 592median: 601.5 (4%)max: 750 Points

96%

i5-8365U+

min: 558avg: 584median: 579 (4%)max: 620 Points

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 111avg: 155median: 159 (46%)max: 164 Points

104%

i5-8365U+

min: 163avg: 166.5median: 166 (48%)max: 171 Points

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 5.22avg: 6median: 5.7 (7%)max: 7.22 Points

100%

i5-8365U+

5.7 Points (7%)

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 1.73avg: 1.8median: 1.8 (44%)max: 1.88 Points

108%

i5-8365U+

1.9 Points (47%)

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 5841avg: 6044median: 6082 (37%)max: 6209 Points

108%

i5-8365U+

6557 Points (40%)

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 16318avg: 18952median: 19418 (14%)max: 22962 Points

85%

i5-8365U+

16518 Points (12%)

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 18924avg: 21959median: 21775.5 (15%)max: 25361 Points

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 7705avg: 7880median: 7919 (10%)max: 7975 Points

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 371.4avg: 402.4median: 402.4 (5%)max: 433.3 s

101%

i5-8365U+

296.7 s (4%)

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 9.635avg: 11median: 11 (2%)max: 12.41 s

101%

i5-8365U+

7.7 s (2%)

WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 3215avg: 4040median: 3988 (6%)max: 4916 Points

80%

i5-8365U+

3173 Points (5%)

7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 13731avg: 16360median: 16245 (9%)max: 18802 MIPS

106%

i5-8365U+

min: 16711avg: 17312median: 17293 (10%)max: 17932 MIPS

7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 3780avg: 4054median: 4084 (49%)max: 4195 MIPS

106%

i5-8365U+

min: 3958avg: 4261median: 4346 (52%)max: 4478 MIPS

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 31.9avg: 37.2median: 39.1 (14%)max: 40.5 fps

92%

i5-8365U+

35.9 fps (13%)

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 150.5avg: 158.7median: 156 (36%)max: 169.5 fps

98%

i5-8365U+

153 fps (35%)

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 3.38avg: 4.2median: 4.2 (7%)max: 4.8 fps

107%

i5-8365U+

min: 4.3avg: 4.5median: 4.5 (8%)max: 4.7 fps

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 0.427avg: 0.5median: 0.5 (14%)max: 0.464 GB/s

101%

i5-8365U+

0.5 GB/s (14%)

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 0.708avg: 0.8median: 0.8 (14%)max: 0.789 GB/s

101%

i5-8365U+

0.8 GB/s (14%)

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 4.1avg: 4.3median: 4.4 (11%)max: 4.5 GB/s

105%

i5-8365U+

4.6 GB/s (12%)

Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *

100%

1 i5-8265U+

1565 Seconds (20%)

Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 769avg: 882median: 861 (6%)max: 1098 Seconds

100%

i5-8365U+

min: 791avg: 824median: 825 (6%)max: 855 Seconds

R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 0.72avg: 0.7median: 0.7 (16%)max: 0.754 sec

3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 5637avg: 6330median: 6316 (13%)max: 7439 Points

100%

i5-8365U+

6330 Points (13%)

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 9.762avg: 10median: 9.8 (2%)max: 10.32 s

100%

i5-8365U+

9.2 s (2%)

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 22.12avg: 22.3median: 22.2 (1%)max: 22.43 s

100%

i5-8365U+

21.3 s (1%)

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 543avg: 562median: 552 (2%)max: 590 s

100%

i5-8365U+

546 s (2%)

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 4154avg: 6319median: 6222 (17%)max: 8443 Points

103%

i5-8365U+

min: 6016avg: 6522median: 6395 (17%)max: 7280 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 21036avg: 38716median: 38144 (31%)max: 50513 Points

129%

i5-8365U+

min: 48328avg: 49088median: 49088 (40%)max: 49848 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 21037avg: 37535median: 36912 (30%)max: 48588 Points

136%

i5-8365U+

min: 49912avg: 50182median: 50182 (41%)max: 50452 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 23095avg: 49269median: 52630 (44%)max: 56737 Points

107%

i5-8365U+

min: 55371avg: 56207median: 56206.5 (47%)max: 57042 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 3393avg: 5794median: 5651 (14%)max: 8298 Points

109%

i5-8365U+

min: 5405avg: 5910median: 6159 (16%)max: 6166 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 4640avg: 7934median: 8001 (14%)max: 11278 Points

105%

i5-8365U+

min: 7744avg: 8377median: 8376.5 (15%)max: 9009 Points

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 1837avg: 2540median: 2657 (11%)max: 2931 Points

93%

i5-8365U+

2464 Points (10%)

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 1024avg: 1039median: 1041.5 (41%)max: 1047 Points

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 3442avg: 3669median: 3624.5 (6%)max: 3986 Points

Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 986avg: 1015median: 1017 (4%)max: 1041 Points

Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 2973avg: 3446median: 3365 (11%)max: 3962 Points

Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 2106avg: 4387median: 4514 (45%)max: 4830 Points

107%

i5-8365U+

min: 4647avg: 4823median: 4822.5 (48%)max: 4998 Points

Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 7144avg: 13600median: 13295 (15%)max: 16249 Points

116%

i5-8365U+

min: 14833avg: 15472median: 15472 (17%)max: 16111 Points

Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 4229avg: 4422median: 4433 (60%)max: 4605 Points

103%

i5-8365U+

4558 Points (62%)

Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 13168avg: 13975median: 14368 (35%)max: 14390 Points

94%

i5-8365U+

13444 Points (33%)

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 12198avg: 13659median: 14002 (25%)max: 14499 Points

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 3470avg: 3669median: 3678.5 (72%)max: 3842 Points

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 12221avg: 13021median: 13021 (20%)max: 13821 Points

Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 3805avg: 3906median: 3906 (58%)max: 4007 Points

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 10592avg: 10596median: 10595.5 (85%)max: 10599 Points

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 8582avg: 8660median: 8660 (79%)max: 8738 Points

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 11914avg: 12181median: 12181 (24%)max: 12448 Points

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 12671avg: 13099median: 13099 (26%)max: 13527 Points

Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 11598avg: 11639median: 11639 (30%)max: 11680 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 851avg: 1141median: 1194 (1%)max: 1245 ms

100%

i5-8365U+

min: 1099avg: 1142median: 1161 (1%)max: 1165 ms

Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 83avg: 93.5median: 95.6 (1%)max: 99.8 ms

Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score

100%

i5-8265U+

min: 12842avg: 31246median: 32120 (28%)max: 35563 Points

102%

i5-8365U+

min: 31051avg: 32738median: 32878 (29%)max: 34285 Points

WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score

100%

1 i5-8265U+

145.3 Points (42%)

WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score

100%

1 i5-8265U+

min: 186avg: 187median: 187 (39%)max: 188 Points

CrossMark - CrossMark Overall

100%

1 i5-8265U+

1006 Points (39%)

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *

100%

1 i5-8365U+

39.9 Watt (7%)

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor

100%

1 i5-8365U+

14.5 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8265U → 100% n=37

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-8365U → 103% n=37

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head (5) - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation


v1.28

log 10. 15:07:50

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 10116 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11330 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1725973669s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 05:16:08 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 10116 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 10116 +0.058s ... 0.067s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11330 +0.004s ... 0.071s

#10 got single benchmarks 11330 +0.008s ... 0.079s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.079s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.055s ... 0.134s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.136s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!

> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head

Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017(Update: 1.07.2023)

Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head (2024)

FAQs

Is Ryzen 7 better than i9? ›

For users relying on integrated graphics capabilities, such as gaming or 3D-intensive tasks, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D showcases a better performance than the Core i9 13900K.

Is Ryzen 7 better than the i7 for gaming? ›

AMD Ryzen 7 will offer you a better overall value than the Intel Core i7 CPUs. Remember that both are great choices for gaming and strong performance, as they have performed better than the minimum benchmark score of different games. However, if you are looking for a multitasking beast, the Ryzen 7 is a good choice.

Is Ryzen 5 better than Intel? ›

Ryzen 5 is better for doing many things at once, like making stuff and multitasking. But Core i5 is better for gaming and tasks that need fast responses. As well as Intel CPUs might use less power, too. So, pick Ryzen 5 if you want to do lots of things at once or make stuff.

Is Ryzen 5 better than Ryzen 7? ›

If you want things done as fast as possible then go Ryzen 7. If you're okay with things not quite being buttery smooth or taking a bit longer then Ryzen 5 is your guy.

Is a Ryzen 7 overkill? ›

On the other hand, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is overkill for gaming. If you're someone hoping for increased performance from its extra two cores, you'll be disappointed. That's not how most modern games work, so you'll be left with less money in your pocket for no real reward.

Is Ryzen 9 faster than i9? ›

Translating Specs to Real-World Performance: CPU

On our Cinebench R15 test, which includes both single-core and multi-core workflows, the Ryzen 9 far outpaces the Core i9 when it's using all of its cores and threads. That's a perfectly natural outcome, since the Ryzen 9 has more of them.

Is an i7 or Ryzen 5 better? ›

High Core Counts: The i7 will take the lead in the Ryzen 5 vs i7: Core battle because of its higher core count, which ranges from 4 to 8. Integrated Graphics: Many i7 CPUs come with Intel's integrated graphics, such as Intel UHD Graphics or, in newer models, Intel Iris Xe Graphics.

Is it better to get Ryzen or Intel? ›

Whether Ryzen 5 is better than i7 depends on the specific models being compared and the intended use, such as gaming, productivity, or multitasking. Generally, Ryzen offers better value and multicore performance, while i7 may excel in single-core tasks.

What is the disadvantage of Ryzen 5? ›

What is the downside of AMD Ryzen CPUs? The main disadvantage of AMD CPUs is that they tend to have lower single-core performances than Intel processors, which makes them less suited to high-performance gaming. They also tend to produce more heat when performing high-intensity tasks.

Is Ryzen 7 outdated? ›

Ultimately, the 2700 and 2700X still work well in a lot of scenarios. Anyone more sensitive to framerate or things like render times would benefit from an upgrade, but these CPUs are far from obsolete. They still run most of these games well overall.

What is the newest Ryzen processor? ›

The latest edition to the Ryzen family is a new range of Ryzen 9 processors. Compared to the 8-core/16-thread Ryzen 7s, the new Ryzen 9s have up to 16-cores/32-threads making them monstrously fast for gaming, content creation or simply multitasking lots of applications at once.

Is Ryzen 7 or 9 better? ›

But the Ryzen 9 7950X3D's higher core count and superior boost clock speed may lead to enhanced gaming performance compared to the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. However, for users primarily focused on gaming, the Ryzen 7 still presents a cost-effective option, providing a commendable balance between price and performance.

Is Ryzen 7000 better than i9? ›

AMD Ryzen 9 7000-Series

It's also the second generation of AMD Ryzen processors to have 3D V-Cache models. Intel's 13th-Generation Core i9 offerings have more physical threads than AMD's Ryzen 9 7000-Series chips because of its performance and efficiency core architecture.

What is the Ryzen 7 comparable to? ›

Ryzen 7 CPUs generally come with more cores and threads compared to their Intel i7 counterparts. For example, the Ryzen 7 5800X has 8 cores and 16 threads, while an i7-11700K also has 8 cores but only 16 threads. Both offer similar clock speeds, but architectures differ, affecting overall performance.

What is better Ryzen 9 or Intel 7? ›

Ultimately, the Ryzen 9 packs fewer cores compared to the i7, but it boasts a higher base clock speed than its Intel counterpart.

References

Top Articles
Little 500: What you need to know about races, IU festivities this weekend
Brownsville, TX to Corpus Christi, TX Bus
The Shoppes At Zion Directory
Vegas X Vip.org
Thedirtyship
Kool Online Offender Lookup
Irela Torres Only Fans
Hardheid van drinkwater - Waterbedrijf Groningen
Al Horford House Brookline
Delta Air Lines - Login
Indicafans
Leo 2023 Showtimes Near Amc Merchants Crossing 16
Tacos Diego Hugoton Ks
1977 Elo Hit Wsj Crossword
Sound Of Freedom Showtimes Near Sperry's Moviehouse Holland
When His Eyes Opened Chapter 3096
Lynette Mettey Feet
Rosekellyppv
Carly Carrigan Family Feud Instagram - Carly Carrigan Home Facebook : The best gifs for carly family feud.
Starfield PC, XSX | GRYOnline.pl
Rantingly App
Food Lion.com/Jobs
Paige Van Zant Of Leak
Duen Boobs
The Quiet Girl Showtimes Near Landmark Plaza Frontenac
AC Filters | All About Air Filters for AC | HVAC Filters
Spain
Amerikaanse dollar bestellen | USD kopen
Hatcher Funeral Home Aiken Sc
Women On Twitch Go Without Makeup To Support A Fellow Streamer
Alex Galindo And Leslie Quezada Net Worth 2022
Dumb Money Showtimes Near Maya Cinemas Salinas
Phunextra
Mission Impossible 7 Showtimes Near Regal Willoughby Commons
Sim7 Bus Time
Alexis Drake Donation Request
Culver's Flavor Of The Day Whitewater
Nobivac Pet Passport
Wells Fargo Careers Log In
911 Active Calls Caddo
Mugshots In Waco Texas
Olive Onyx Amora
Kohl's Hixson Tennessee
Centurylink Outage Map Mesa Az
Fraction Button On Ti-84 Plus Ce
Codex Genestealer Cults 10th Edition: The Goonhammer Review
Katia Uriarte Husband
Neuer Extraction-Shooter auf Steam will Escape from Tarkov Konkurrenz machen, wird von echten Militär-Veteranen entwickelt
Tetris Google Sites
Lharkies
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Jonah Leffler

Last Updated:

Views: 5860

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (45 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jonah Leffler

Birthday: 1997-10-27

Address: 8987 Kieth Ports, Luettgenland, CT 54657-9808

Phone: +2611128251586

Job: Mining Supervisor

Hobby: Worldbuilding, Electronics, Amateur radio, Skiing, Cycling, Jogging, Taxidermy

Introduction: My name is Jonah Leffler, I am a determined, faithful, outstanding, inexpensive, cheerful, determined, smiling person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.